[ SECRET POST #2468 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2468 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[spiced_wine]

I agree.
Re: FF.net; I've never used it as an archive as my work is Adult, overall, but friends of mine do use it, and have talked about the entitlement of readers/reviewers. I've followed their complaints and seen comments that make me boggle. It's not concrit about the writing, but rather moans that so-and-so would 'never do that', and people following novel length stories only to whinge that it's not what they want. I would be inclined to tell them to pop off and find something they do like rather than waste their time trying to influence what the author is writing. I've never seen that on AO3, and also when a friend of mine had a genuine complaint, she received a reply from the AO3 staff within 24 hours. They took it seriously, resolved it for her and were very supportive.

[tabaqui]

Exactly. The level of quality stories is a variable, in my mind, as any other archive site, the *users* at AO3 at least don't seem to be as petty and ridiculous as a lot of other users.

And yes - the staff kicks ass.