case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-08 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #2471 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2471 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-09 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. Because I actually agree with OP, except for the severity of the last sentence - if you refuse to see the possibility that their relationship COULD be interpreted as gay, then you have an agenda.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-09 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
or you're delusional

(Anonymous) 2013-10-09 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
It COULD be interpreted as gay; it COULD also be interpreted as platonic. If you're INSISTENT on your interpretation being the paramount interpretation that all people must adhere to... THEN you have an agenda. Having an opinion =/= an agenda.