[ SECRET POST #2471 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2471 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

writing bi/pan characters =/= writing them without sounding like a Monty Python sketch.

[cbrachyrhynchos]

Of course not. The writers I respect don't write LGBT characters in that way. The characters are either in relationships or explicitly describe their desire to be in a relationship with a MOTAS.

What I don't respect is when writers and showrunners feed ship drama with campy innuendo. Two other examples are BBC's Watson and Ritchie's Holmes. Hinting that a character maybe-possibly-maybe pansexual or bisexual is like giving me a banana split without the ice cream, syrup, whipped cream, and cherry. It's not going to satisfy me, and I'll just hop on down the street to a place where I can get the real thing.