case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-10 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2473 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2473 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Inspired by troll on P1

(Anonymous) 2013-10-11 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
Point of information here - when you're making this argument, are you assigning unborn babies the moral standing of human beings? Do you think your position is basically true even if life begins at conception?

Re: Inspired by troll on P1

(Anonymous) 2013-10-11 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
I'm basically saying that whether embryos, fetuses, etc. have equivalent moral standing to born humans or not doesn't matter, because even if they did, no born human has the right to use a non-consenting person's body to sustain their own life.

Re: Inspired by troll on P1

(Anonymous) 2013-10-11 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you for the clarification.