case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-10 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2473 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2473 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
lynx: (Default)

Re: Human =/= a human

[personal profile] lynx 2013-10-11 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
I like your style. Yes. We should NOT call them pro-lifers. If they cared about the mother, or the quality of life of the actual baby after it's born, THEN they would've earned that title. But they do not. When I've debated this issue in Spanish, I've only ever called them the equivalent of "anti-abortists", never "pro-lifers". That kind of people usually do not have an ounce of compassion on them. If they don't care about a fellow human being's life and dreams, only because she's a woman and therefore her rights matter less of the rights of an unborn human who doesn't even have the concept of a life project of its own... why would they care about cattle, or poultry?

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-10-11 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been raised to believe abortion is wrong, and if the situation arose (though I really hope it never does), I doubt I would be able to go through with an abortion, but I can't believe that it's right to force someone to carry a child to term if they don't want to.
lynx: (Default)

Re: +1

[personal profile] lynx 2013-10-11 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Uhm. Well, as I saw quoted in another thread, then... you're actually pro-choice. Because YOUR choice would be "to keep the baby", but despite thinking abortion is wrong, you acknowledge the different moral standings of others, their beliefs, and their needs - And most importantly: you wouldn't force your choice in other women. Which is not something the so-called "pro-life" (or "anti-abortion") movements do.