[ SECRET POST #2474 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]























07. [SPOILERS for NCIS]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Dangan Ronpa]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Uh

[(Anonymous)]

You do have a point, but you should recognize how saying stuff about how you'll recuse a puppy over a baby sounds crazypants.

Re: Uh

[(Anonymous)]

OP here

Why do you think I posted this anon in the unpopular opinions thread?

It makes sense to me, but of course I understand that people are going to get mad over it. I have noticed that humans have the tendency to put other human beings above all and everything else, simply because they are also human beings and nothing more, you know. Species loyalty runs deep in people :)

Re: Uh

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT - So, the OP has agreed with me twice in this thread and I just wanna throw it out there that I don't agree with them on the babies not being people thing. A kitten is a baby cat. A puppy is a baby dog. How is a baby person not a person? Not being able to recognize them as such sounds more like a flaw of the OP's, not in babies, but I'm not an expert. Anyway. I honestly have no fucking clue what I would do in the fire situation. Probably grab the baby and try to chase the dog out or coax it to come with me? But it depends on how close I was to either, and if I myself am capable of getting out, and whether or not the dog already instinctively escaped. Hell maybe the dog decided to save the baby and leave me to burn. I'm not a dog person any more than I am a baby person, and dogs can probably tell that. See? This is why I don't like the fire scenario in arguments.

Re: Uh

[(Anonymous)]

Not OP

I think OP is saying that there is a difference between "human" and "person." A baby human is obviously a human, but "person" implies something more than belonging to a particular species. An AI that was capable of sufficiently sophisticated learning and reasoning and had attained self-awareness might be considered a "person." OP is saying that they don't see babies as having achieved personhood yet; it's not a "failure to recognize" anything.

As an aside, I don't know whether I agree with the OP on that score or not; I think personhood is a fuzzy concept.