case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-11 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2474 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]























07. [SPOILERS for NCIS]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Dangan Ronpa]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
saku: (Default)

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

[personal profile] saku 2013-10-12 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
it derailed once op said babies weren't people, because that wasn't me interpreting their comment, that was them straight up saying it .

and the issue is that babies are people. it's ok to not like babies or relate to them (i sure as heck don't) but you don't need to reduce them to something less than they are. it seemed like an attempt to escape judgment when it wasn't really necessary and kinda ended up backfiring, from the look of the thread

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

(Anonymous) 2013-10-12 06:20 am (UTC)(link)
Hrmm.. like you say OP doesn't NEED to reduce them but I think what OP was getting at was thats how they naturally see babies anyway, as not-people, thats how it naturally is perceived for them always, they can't help it.

And they keep saying in other threads they expect people to be mad that they don't consider babies people and thats what people are doing so I don't think they're trying to escape anything so much as being like yeah they expected the judging? IDK
saku: (Default)

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

[personal profile] saku 2013-10-12 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
yeah and that's why i reminded them that babies are people

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

(Anonymous) 2013-10-12 08:05 am (UTC)(link)
No, it was more like OP trying to articulate the way they relate (or fail to relate) to babies -- i.e., that they don't ping as "people" automatically in OP's head -- and you deciding that meant that OP wanted to oppress anyone who didn't meet certain criteria. That was where the derailment took place.
saku: (Default)

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

[personal profile] saku 2013-10-12 08:25 am (UTC)(link)
oppression never came into the discussion, your jump is awfully fallacious. op went from not identifying babies as people (which i do sometimes also, i stated as much) to directly implying that babies were not people. the two are very different; the former is an admitted subjectivity whereas the latter is making a far more objective claim.