[ SECRET POST #2474 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]























07. [SPOILERS for NCIS]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Dangan Ronpa]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

[(Anonymous)]

anyway, there is no other definition of personhood except a legal one.

No. It is a word that HAS a legal definition, but it also has other, subjective definitions (that in no way affect any legal definition, but nonetheless exist). The word "reasonable" has a legal definition too, but I can still subjectively decide whether something is reasonable or not without recourse to a law textbook.

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

[saku]

i clarified elsewhere that any other "definition" of personhood is directly related to legalities. i also stated that even if you wish to argue otherwise, in this instance, right here, babies are people