[ SECRET POST #2475 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2475 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Supernatural, Watchmen]


__________________________________________________



04.
[a case of exploding mangoes (2008 novel)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Brothers in Arms]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Agents of SHIELD ]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Transformers: IDW Generation One]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sarah Michelle Gellar]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Young Guns 2]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Sherlock Holmes canon vs fanon

[dreemyweird]

Yeah, I think it's entirely fanon. (albeit canon compliant)

Re: Sherlock Holmes canon vs fanon

[(Anonymous)]

Wait, I'm confused. How can it be canon compliant to say that they're a posthumous tribute when they definitely weren't?

Re: Sherlock Holmes canon vs fanon

[intrigueing]

Neither Watson nor anyone else actually says (or hints or implies) that they were a posthumous tribute. However, having them be a posthumous tribute would be totally in-character and totally fit into the stories' chronology. Basically, there's nothing in canon to contradict the theory, even though it's just something the fans made up.

Re: Sherlock Holmes canon vs fanon

[(Anonymous)]

But there is something in canon to contradict the theory that the stories are all written as a posthumous tribute. Holmes comments upon Watson's writing more than once, so clearly they existed while he was still alive. There's also "The Adventure of the Lion's Mane", which is Holmes' narration discussing a case that took place after he retired to Sussex.

I just don't think the posthumous tribute idea stands up to scrutiny. If Watson had written it as such, it'd be far more likely he'd say so-- look at how effusive his tribute in "The Final Solution" was. I'd chalk this theory up to wishful thinking from fans.

Re: Sherlock Holmes canon vs fanon

[dreemyweird]

...but nobody says that all the stories were written as a tribute. Look upthread.