[ SECRET POST #2475 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2475 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Supernatural, Watchmen]


__________________________________________________



04.
[a case of exploding mangoes (2008 novel)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Brothers in Arms]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Agents of SHIELD ]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Transformers: IDW Generation One]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sarah Michelle Gellar]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Young Guns 2]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Sherlock Holmes canon vs fanon

[intrigueing]

It's never really discussed. Fans (strongly supported by ACD's in-character introductions and Watson's explanations for why he didn't publish a case that happened ages ago for so long) generally assume that the dates that ACD's stories were published directly coincide with the dates that Watson's stories were published, and, IRL, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes were all first written and published during July 1891-December 1893, i.e., during the period when Watson, in the stories, thought Holmes was dead. On the other hand, A Study in Scarlet was written in 1887 and The Sign of Four was written in 1890, before Holmes "died". So it's very, very, very easy to view the Adventures/Memoirs as something of a tribute and/or motivated by grief, but he never says so AFAIK.

On the other hand, Watson says The Final Problem was written explicitly in order to refute Moriarty's brother's claims that Professor Moriarty was innocent. But usually, he only gives reasons for why he declined to publish certain cases for so long, not for why he wrote them.