case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-13 03:23 pm

[ SECRET POST #2476 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2476 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-13 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Generally safe to assume, sure. Absolutely certain, nope.

And that's what fic is for, exploring possibilities. :D

(Anonymous) 2013-10-13 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
But here's what I don't understand - why does it matter to you whether or not you can find a way to justify the possibility of them being queer canonically? If you want to explore possibilities, explore possibilities. There's nothing stopping you from doing that, no matter how canonically het they are. It just looks, to me, like an unnecessary step to take.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-13 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
It doesn't matter to me whether it's canon or not, really. I'm going to do whatever I like in fanfic. I'm perfectly OK with doing a total AU where a 100% straight character is gay, whatevs!

I just feel it's inaccurate to say that every character who has shown attraction toward same-gender and has never denied attraction any others is incapable of being bisexual, for the reasons I stated above.

"The possibility of bisexuality being canon still exists, sometimes." I was merely mentioning that. :)

(Anonymous) 2013-10-13 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah well fair enough then!