case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-13 03:23 pm

[ SECRET POST #2476 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2476 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
silverr: abstract art of pink and purple swirls on a black background (Default)

[personal profile] silverr 2013-10-13 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh, kudos on Ao3 are the same as Favorites on FF.net.

I post most of what I write in both places, and I've never been able to come up with a reason for the patterns in the the hits/kudos/comments. Yuletide fics aside, stuff on FFnet gets more hits, with a lower percentange of feedback, but what feedback I do get is split between reviews and favorites. I get fewer hits overall on Ao3, but the feedback percentage is higher — and yet it's 90% kudos.

The only theory I have is that FFnet gets people who have been in fandom longer, those who predate FB/tumblr; perhaps they're inclined to write an actual review. Conversely, maybe Ao3 has a lot of newer fans who think a Facebook/tumbler "thumbs'-up" is sufficient.
Edited 2013-10-13 21:05 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2013-10-13 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
That's actually a pretty good explanation. I'm inclined to agree.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-13 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
FFnet gets people who have been in fandom longer

Huh, my experience is the exact opposite, or it was about 5 years ago before I stopped posting on FF.net. Seems like every other reviewer was new to fandom, couldn't spell, and was somewhere in their early teens.
silverr: abstract art of pink and purple swirls on a black background (Default)

[personal profile] silverr 2013-10-13 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I was just theorizing based on my own experience and the fandoms I've been in.

I started on FFnet in late 2002, and the only fact is that before 2008 or so I used to get a LOT more reviews per story. I have no way of knowing if the decline in reviews is due to my moving to other fandoms, because I began to write shit (I don't think I did, but I'm hardly objective), because the pool of potential readers changed, or because of an entirely random neutrino event.
Edited 2013-10-13 22:54 (UTC)
truxillogical: (Default)

[personal profile] truxillogical 2013-10-14 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'd say the comments on AO3 (that I've seen) tend to be a little...better(?) than the ones on ffn. Not, y'know, universally, but ff.n always seemed to have way more teenybopper to it.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-14 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
a lot of those early teens grew up and got used to the ff.net style of commenting, so even if the older users are only 17/18/19 now they're still used to the commenting style of feedback

at least that's been my experience (as a early teen who wrote poorly spelt reviews on ff.net five years ago)