case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-15 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2478 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2478 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[rune factory 4]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Law & Order]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Wander Over Yonder]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Breaking Bad]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Transformers: IDW Generation One]


__________________________________________________



07.
(Panic! at the Disco)


__________________________________________________



08.
[Luke Evans as Bard the Bowman in "The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug"]


__________________________________________________



09.
[league of legends pro teams - team curse]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: Misaimed Fandom

[personal profile] intrigueing 2013-10-16 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
No. Sorry. Disagree entirely. Preferences do not work that way, and you are (hopefully just by accident) talking about preferences, not interpretation or logical argument, and your comment here is (again, hopefully by accident) telling people their preferences are wrong and they are wrong for liking something. Some people really do subscribe to death of the author, and it actually is possible to worldbuild by accident.

Re: Misaimed Fandom

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2013-10-16 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
It is a misinterpretation because Tolkien wasn't in the business of creating a credible geography, history, or anthropology. He was creating literature-within-literature. The general method is described in detail in his insistence that Beowulf should be analyzed as literature and not a cryptically coded window into the history of Geats and language of Anglo-Saxons, and the specific method is laid out in the introduction to the Silmarillion.

It's not a preference, it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what Tolkien's fantasy does. What it does is tell stories of, and I'll quote the man himself on this, "Fall, Mortality and Machine." The setting is built around the conflict, not the conflict to the setting (as is the case with SF&F that does rigorously worldbuild.)

EDIT: To put it another way, it's like calling Star Trek hard science fiction because it had non-chemical propulsion drives, portable medical diagnostics, and handheld communicators. (Never mind the chicken-egg problem that those are three things invented by lifelong trekkies.) Hard science fiction wasn't exactly the point, and Star Trek never let plausibility get in the way of a good yarn.
Edited 2013-10-16 04:37 (UTC)