Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-10-16 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2479 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2479 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
So... being dickish to one group of people (by stripping them of the national identity they chose for themselves and have always had in their language/culture) is perfectly acceptable so long as you're not dickish to another group of people (who still have their national identities, as well as continental identities, but would like to retain the supra-continental identity that they're accustomed to in another language/culture by co-opting the national identity of the former).
Claiming that "insisting" on being called your own name is a dickish thing to do is a stretch.
Why is it that Americans must be the one to invent a new word and change their identities, anyway? Why not just keep using the word "Americano" - in English - to mean what it does in Spanish: "a citizen of the Americas"? It would hardly be the first world English has adopted from a romance language even though it technically has the same word and gave the new word a different nuance?