Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-10-23 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2486 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2486 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #355.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-23 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)I'm also sure you have some weird tastes yourself.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-23 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-23 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)alsol lol @ "Over-investment is today's version of female hysterics"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-23 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)Also, anyone who would go out of their way to track down personal information of someone and post it around without permission, or use it to attack someone because they had a different headcanon... yeah, that's over-investment. And that shit needs to stop.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-23 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)when really, most of the time, when people say someone is over-invested or too "into" something, that person is simply very happy and vocal and involved in it. and there is in fact no evidence that they are neglecting their aunt's dog's puppies in order to watch a tv show episode or whatever.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 12:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 01:00 am (UTC)(link)there are shades of grey to this shit, people
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 01:21 am (UTC)(link)people who feel that their own personal level of investment in something is just fine don't usually feel the need to jump in saying "NOT ME!"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 12:19 am (UTC)(link)if you can't have a discussion about any topic without somehow trying to tie it in to your fandom? that's being over-invested. if you take someone not liking your canon or a particular pairing or character in it as a personal attack? that's being over-invested.
i love my fandoms, i love the characters and the plotlines and i can happily talk about them for hours - to someone who wants to listen. but i also know when to tone it down, and if someone doesn't like my favorite pairing, it's no skin off my nose. it's pretty easy to tell when someone has crossed the line from "enthusiastic" to "now you're just getting creepy."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 12:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 12:53 am (UTC)(link)anyone who doesn't think that it can be a problem hasn't ever been stuck in a line to see a movie with someone who could not stop talking about the full history of blah blah blah and how they changed x and y from the original comics because in the comics, it was actually z who did this one thing and they don't understand why the producers had to change that because don't you know how crucial it was to z's character?
there are some things that are not excusable by any level of enthusiasm, full stop.
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 02:28 am (UTC)(link)Being unable to disengage, however, and getting as attached to and upset about fictional things as though they were real, is never a good thing.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 07:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 07:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)yeah, been hit with that one more than once.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)