[ SECRET POST #2486 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2486 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #355.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[tree_and_leaf]

I'm not actually all that much of a Bradbury fan, and I think the people who are calling him misogynist have a point, but he was definitely a much better writer than Asimov. Asimov's great fun, and he has some memorable big ideas, but he's kind of... cardboardy. Whereas even though I don't like Bradbury all that much, his stories have lingered with me in a way that Asimov's just haven't. YMMV, of course, but I don't think it's intrinsically ridiculous to call Bradbury a better writer.

On the other hand, Asimov probably had more influence on the development of the genre. Bradbury's kind of an outlier in genre terms, and he certainly didn't write hard SF.