case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-24 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2487 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2487 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Vincent D'Onofrio in "Adventures in Babysitting"]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Legend of Korra]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Little Mermaid]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Moby Dick]


__________________________________________________



07.
[American Horror Story]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Ian McKellan and Patrick Stewart]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Yogscast]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Welcome to Night Vale]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #355.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
vethica: (Default)

[personal profile] vethica 2013-10-24 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure, that's possible. But being sexually attracted to people is not the same as having sex with people. Is my point.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, I see, you're all about "replies that totally are irrelevant to original comments" in this thread.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
No, they just don't feel like holding your hand and taking you step-by-step through the discovery of why you're wrong.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Go for it, then. The burden of proof is on the claimant.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-25 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
OR AYRT is spot on already but their opposite number (and you) can't bear to admit they aren't a speshul, oh-so-persecuted snoflake.
vethica: (Default)

[personal profile] vethica 2013-10-24 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
This was part of your original comment.

Don't want to fuck someone unless there's an emotional connection involved? We don't need a whole new term for that, it's called, "I'm not into casual sex."

This is what I said.

But being sexually attracted to people is not the same as having sex with people. Is my point.

I thought the connection made sense, but if you didn't understand what I was going for, I can try to explain it more in-depth.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-24 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
"I don't want to do X" and especially "I'm not into X" can be interpreted as "I have no interest in X" or "X leaves me cold" - this is the attraction part. Oftentimes this implies "I don't do X" - this is the behavior that follows. Then there are the people who behave the same way -- they "don't do X" -- despite having an interest a.k.a. attraction. Both normal and common.

Flip this around and we have "I am interested into X but I don't do X (for whatever reason)", which is what you're talking about. Where X is "to fuck someone".