case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-24 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2487 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2487 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Vincent D'Onofrio in "Adventures in Babysitting"]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Legend of Korra]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Little Mermaid]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Moby Dick]


__________________________________________________



07.
[American Horror Story]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Ian McKellan and Patrick Stewart]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Yogscast]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Welcome to Night Vale]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #355.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-25 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
And I'm sure people who only desire sex without any emotional connection exist, and they're just as different from you as 'demisexuals'. Maybe they need a label too. It would be equally meaningless.

We are sexual creatures. We then qualify our sexual experience with so-and-so conditions. None of us are special, even if said conditions are as strict as to become requirements.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-25 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
We DO have a label for those people. Unfortunately, it's also a very bad word that shouldn't be USED to label people. Starts with S, rhymes with "glut".

I am in the "really, this doesn't need a special label" camp WRT people who only want to have sex once they form an emotional connection. Mostly because I really, really hate labels. But perhaps we should start calling "sex with everything hot without a connection" people, erm, pindropsexuals!
darkmanifest: (Default)

[personal profile] darkmanifest 2013-10-25 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)
That's actually not the word I've seen. The word is "aromantic [insert group]sexual". See? Everybody can have a special label for no apparent reason!