case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-26 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2489 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2489 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #356.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Spreadsheet anon?

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-10-27 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know what's available in the private sector off the top of my head, but I would be genuinely amazed if you didn't have things programmes available mimicking the basics of all the police and military intelligence systems.

Re: Spreadsheet anon?

(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
So...judge a program, but offer no alternatives?

Yeah, that's super useful.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Spreadsheet anon?

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-10-27 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not the person spending a significant amount of time stalking people.

If they want to waste less time, they can look out a specific option, I was just judging their choice.

Re: Spreadsheet anon?

(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
....Excel is a good system for simple data gathering and organisation though. Just because it's easily available =/= it's a shit platform
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Spreadsheet anon?

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-10-27 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
It's passable if you've got a limited number of basic data points in exclusion, and provenance is unnecessary.