Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-10-30 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2493 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2493 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #356.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
The argument I find the most derptastic is thing about how the female characters look like Rapunzel or are copies of her. Those are based on leaked 'mock up' /concept' sketches. Things that were used to present the idea before it had any funding. So yeah they re skinned and existing character.
I do that in my writing /character sketching sometimes. The cutie in my avatar there? He was originally based of an AU version of a character from my main work. Until I fixed up him to be his OWN character with his OWN story. It doesn't make him any less original or unique because of where he came from.
I can see some other grievousness people might have. But trotting out the thing about the Rapunzel-models. nah bro...just...nah.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-31 01:28 am (UTC)(link)And as for giving it a chance, the plot has already been leaked with the pre-release of one of the books. It's bland, really, really bland.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-31 02:06 am (UTC)(link)