[ SECRET POST #2499 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2499 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
(Questionable Content)


__________________________________________________



03.
[Transformers]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sherlock Holmes/C. Auguste Dupin]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Pacific Rim]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Obscurus Lupa Presents]


__________________________________________________



07.
[k-pop]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Ian McKellan and Patrick Stewart]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Neil Gaiman, Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Teen Wolf]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #357.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: S!A

[(Anonymous)]

>>>what bothers me is people who seem to be insisting that it MUST be a woman...i think making the doctor a woman is not the only way to accomplish the objective of 'giving girls an awesome time traveling hero to watch'.<<<

I'm not saying the Doctor must be a woman. I'm saying there's no such thing as "separate but equal." not that U.S. law is applicable in any way, but the concept applies. it's not possible to be separate and still be equal. by separating, you are creating an inequity. it was never truer than in this case, where the Doctor can be anyone, as its creator intended.

anyway, I am sorry to belabor the point. but I do think if it happened and they made the Doctor a woman? the future would roll on and the next generations would say, what was the big deal?

just like after there was a woman as Watson, history rolled on. or after there were women in combat people rolled with it. or after DADT was repealed in the U.S., it turned out to be almost an anti-climax compared to the sturm-und-drang. sometimes these decisions have to be made despite the panicked naysayers.

anyway, thank you for the thoughtful discussion. you have been a charming debate-mate.

Re: S!A

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, Watson was a woman when they rebooted the show. Now if Martin Freeman went out for a coffee and came back with a set of tits halfway through an episode of Sherlock, then perhaps it might not be so easily gotten over.

Not that Elementary is much of a Holmes show anyway. Everyone in it is pretty much an INO and its closer to Monk than it is to Holmes. So it is more like they recast Sharona as a woma... Oh, wait.

Re: S!A

[(Anonymous)]

no, fair enough, i agree that people would move on and accept it pretty quickly if they did cast the doctor as a woman.

i don't know that i agree w the separate but equal comment in this case, tho. because i think if you want to make that analogy you have to make it on the level of the system - the point is that you can't have separate systems for different classes, and pretend that you're treating those classes as equals. but that doesn't mean that you can't have a separate character and have it be equal; it means that you can't have separate ways of treating male and female characters in general and have it be equal(and obviously, we do).

i think that, if we had a female character who was treated the same way the doctor is, it wouldn't much matter whether or not they called the character the doctor or not, or whether it had the history of the specific character. the problem arises if a new female character would be treated differently (as they would be). i really don't think the issue is with the specific character of The Doctor.

this has definitely been a very interesting discussion, thanks to you as well for being cool to talk about this with.