Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-08 06:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #2502 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2502 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
14. [SPOILERS for Battlestar Galactica 2003]

__________________________________________________
15. [SPOILERS for the Snowpiercer]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for Gravity]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #357.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - pretty sure these are ancient repeats ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 12:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 03:02 am (UTC)(link)Because they're saying exactly that, that people judge them for not having the "right" views or making the "right" statements, hence they must not be liberal.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 04:22 am (UTC)(link)Because presumably, a conservative cannot get "more progressive," they can only all of a sudden become progressive, which isn't likely to happen. So if OP were just conservative, nobody would say "Get more progressive!" and most would recognize the futility of saying "Become progressive/Reverse Your Entire Outlook" and would instead just leave OP alone.
no subject
That still doesn't make any sense to me, but thank you for explaining the logic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)