[ SECRET POST #2502 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2502 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


02.



__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________

















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















14. [SPOILERS for Battlestar Galactica 2003]



__________________________________________________



15. [SPOILERS for the Snowpiercer]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for Gravity]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #357.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - pretty sure these are ancient repeats ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Not necessarily. CAN it go hand in hand? Yes. But some people just believe that there should be more of a limit to how the government spends tax money.

That's true, but I think the space for that to be true and for those views to exist without being implicated in some kind of classist or racist point of view is fairly small. More to the point, in actually-existing American politics, the agenda of fiscal conservatism - especially as it exists in the Republican Party (although it's also fairly present in the Democratic Party) - really is intimately tied in with a conservative social agenda and a whole slew of classist and racist views, assumptions, and policies. Some have even argued that this racist and classist element is a substantial part of the political appeal of these policies. If you're supporting a policy of fiscal conservatism, it's pretty difficult to only vote for the parts of it that you approve. In the actual practical political sphere, you are, of necessity, supporting it with classism and racism attached.

I'm not saying that you necessarily shouldn't support it, or that supporting it makes you a bad person, or anything. I mean, this kind of complexity is probably present, mutatis mutandis, in political existence in general - we live in a deeply imperfect world and compromise is necessary. But the complexity is there.

The internet has made it so you're either enlightened and empathetic, and that makes you liberal, or none of those things, which means you are conservative. That is not how the real world works.

I agree with that. Neither side has a monopoly on good or on evil. We are not enemies.

[(Anonymous)]

You sound like you are my enemy from what you wrote.

[(Anonymous)]

:(

sorry i'm a shitty poster

[(Anonymous)]

People who honestly and accurately describe existing political ideologies and structures are your enemy? Sucks to be you.