Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-08 06:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #2502 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2502 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
14. [SPOILERS for Battlestar Galactica 2003]

__________________________________________________
15. [SPOILERS for the Snowpiercer]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for Gravity]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #357.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - pretty sure these are ancient repeats ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

"Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 04:32 am (UTC)(link)But I keep quiet un-anon, mainly because the first reaction is always that I'm saying "dickbag" is AS BAD as "cunt" when it's not because OMG HISTORY (and yes, I know and I agree) and the second -- or perhaps simultaneous -- thought is that I must be an MRA piece of shit.
When I'm not, I just think that if a concept is unacceptable, it's unacceptable, regardless of who the focus is. And the concept of saying "this thing that is a symbol of an entire sex is synonymous with bad" is unacceptable.
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 04:51 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, no.
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 06:30 am (UTC)(link)Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 06:48 am (UTC)(link)I think you've got that backwards.
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 05:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 05:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 06:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: "Bag of dicks"
That's an interesting interpretation of Dune.
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 06:23 am (UTC)(link)Why dick has come to mean jerk I do not know.
I also don't know why people refer to the external genitalia as junk. Surely that should be the opposite of junk?
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 06:29 am (UTC)(link)But that's the thing, again. Put in a slightly different light, it's unacceptable to call someone gay when what you really mean is dumb, and cover your ass by saying "I didn't mean like *gay* gay. I just meant it as stupid." So why then is it okay to call someone who's being a jerk a dick? And without that, you don't get to "bag of dicks."
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)It's like "you're an asshole" versus "you're an armpit". Calling someone an asshole means something specific, whereas calling someone an armpit is negative, but imprecise.
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 10:40 am (UTC)(link)You are an MRA piece of shit.
Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "Bag of dicks"
(Anonymous) 2013-11-09 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)