fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2503 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2503 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 105 secrets from Secret Submission Post #358.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

^This. Not finding someone attractive is not the same as "ugly". Ugly implies that their appearance is actually physically revolting. Seriously, when did this become a thing on the internet? Because in RL most people still seem to know the difference, at least in my experience.

this x100. i'm actually surprised by some of the comments in this threat tbh, because it seems most people here don't understand the difference between finding someone attractive personally, and acknowledging that there is a mainstream ideal of beauty that people like megan fox fit into (and as a result of that, she certainly isn't "ugly" regardless of your preferences).

I find people who look like they're made of plastic physically revolting.

[ SECRET POST #2503 ]

no subject

no subject

no subject