Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-09 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2503 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2503 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 105 secrets from Secret Submission Post #358.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: SA
Another thing, however, is that I don't see much sense in interpreting pre-twentieth century fictional characters as mentally ill, unless they were based on some very specific experiences the author had with real mentally ill folks or on some person who had mental issues. [or unless their problems are blatantly obvious, of course, but that's beside the point]. The point is, the 19th century characters are not 19th century people - they're a secondary product, mostly created by authors who had no clue as to what personality disorders are. Even if it is in the canon, it was not intended as an illness.
IDK, I'm a bit of two minds about it. There was ACD's father, but it was an obvious case, and he was pretty much perfectly dysfunctional in the end. I don't think it had anything to do with Holmes.
But the anon's phrasing was awkward, true. I assumed they only meant Asperger's while talking about empathy.