case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-09 03:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #2503 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2503 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.



__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 105 secrets from Secret Submission Post #358.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dreemyweird: (austere)

Re: SA

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-11-10 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, I agree that borderline issues are a valid interpretation. I don't see the character this way, and I certainly cannot see him having a full-blown personality disorder (...well, maybe a mild bipolar. Maybe.), but it's there.

Another thing, however, is that I don't see much sense in interpreting pre-twentieth century fictional characters as mentally ill, unless they were based on some very specific experiences the author had with real mentally ill folks or on some person who had mental issues. [or unless their problems are blatantly obvious, of course, but that's beside the point]. The point is, the 19th century characters are not 19th century people - they're a secondary product, mostly created by authors who had no clue as to what personality disorders are. Even if it is in the canon, it was not intended as an illness.

IDK, I'm a bit of two minds about it. There was ACD's father, but it was an obvious case, and he was pretty much perfectly dysfunctional in the end. I don't think it had anything to do with Holmes.

But the anon's phrasing was awkward, true. I assumed they only meant Asperger's while talking about empathy.