[ SECRET POST #2505 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2505 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 061 secrets from Secret Submission Post #358.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 16 - one persistent repeat spammer (I have tried to keep your non-repeats, however!) ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: "There's no such thing as a homewrecker"

[darkmanifest]

My problem with the term, besides it usually only being applied to women, is that it's erroneously used. The "homewrecker" is the cheater, not the person they're cheating with, who is just an asshole (if they're aware of the committed relationship). The person outside of the household cannot be the one responsible for wrecking it, unless they're using mind control. They're only responsible for, at most, contributing to homewrecking. But the cheater themselves is the homewrecker, always.