case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-16 03:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2510 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2510 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 092 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2013-11-17 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
As I understand it, the offensiveness is part historical context, part general "on it's own it's not so bad but in the broader context of race in the media, it's bad" context.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-11-17 04:46 am (UTC)(link)
That's still a bit vague.
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2013-11-17 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
It means while the portrayal was meant to be positive, it was both invoking an extremely racist institution (crows = Jim Crow laws) for a laugh, as well as perpetuating an image of black personality, one that fed into a much broader cultural narrative of blacks - especially black men - as being lazy and high. Jovial, maybe, but still lazy and "too jovial" (re: intoxicated, weather from smoking or drinking or something else) and not reliable for anything more than, say, giving advice to hapless kids. Meant to be positive, but if you are a black man looking for a job and every white guy thinks of you as having the same personality (and more importantly, reliability) as those crows, then it becomes a negative.