fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2511 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2511 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[The Hobbit]

__________________________________________________

03.

[The Fly 1986]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Slightly Damned]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Game Of Thrones]

__________________________________________________

06.

[DC Comics]

__________________________________________________

07.

[NCIS]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Roosterteeth]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Mass Effect]
[Art: The Shepard Siblings, by bigcman321]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Easy A]

__________________________________________________

11.

[Sleepy Hollow]

__________________________________________________

12.

[Sir David Attenborough]

__________________________________________________

13.

[New Tricks]

__________________________________________________

14.

[Hannibal (NBC)]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

The people assuming that furry=>good would bother me more, because at least demon=>bad is a reasonable assumption based on the word's meaning in the English language. Yeah, a lot of works of fiction subvert it and have good or sympathetic demons, but the word by itself means bad things. By definition. Furry just means... furry. They have fur.

This is the only comic I've ever read where the author both accepts the "furry" label (to the point of submitting it for awards for furry comics) and portrays some of the furries as evil*. I've read a few that have furries who do horrible, horrible things, but this comic calls them out on it, whereas other comics usually portray anything they do as morally justified. (I think the author made a mistake in promoting the comic as furry--it outright ignores a lot of the tropes of furry fantasy, and feels more like a heroic fantasy that happens to use fuzzy and scaly races in place of elves and dwarves.)

P.S. To be clear, the demons aren't evil as a whole, any more than they're good as a whole, but there are some demons who're clearly portrayed as evil.

* I haven't read Tales of the Questor, so it might be another exception.

Actually, for the longest time Rai protested the furry label, and still does! She just submitted it to Ursa Major because it qualified and she wanted it to win an award of some sort.

"Wait, why do you care? I thought you didn’t like the furry label?
I just don’t like being limited. If I went around calling Slightly Damned a furry comic, then people would think it’s only for furries because of the stigma attached to that label. Slightly Damned is for everyone! And it would be nice to get some recognition for once.
…Besides, if works like “Brave” and “Rise of the Guardians” qualify, I don’t see why Slightly Damned wouldn’t.
"

is her exact position on the label.

What about Jack?

Everything I've heard about Jack makes it sound like it would make me vomit, so I've avoided it.

[ SECRET POST #2511 ]

no subject

OP

Oh no it's my guilty pleasure webcomic.

Re: OP

Re: OP

OP