[ SECRET POST #2511 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2511 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Hobbit]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Fly 1986]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Slightly Damned]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Game Of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



06.
[DC Comics]


__________________________________________________



07.
[NCIS]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Roosterteeth]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Mass Effect]
[Art: The Shepard Siblings, by bigcman321]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Easy A]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Sleepy Hollow]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Sir David Attenborough]


__________________________________________________



13.
[New Tricks]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Hannibal (NBC)]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Somewhat related question

[gondremark]

Another thing the rhetoric seems to be missing is that a bisexual person who says "I like dudes and I like chicks" does not exclude transgender people who are just dudes and chicks. Nothing more, nothing less. I'm a dude, if a guy liked me that would be gay, if a girl liked me that would be straight. The regrettable contents of my pants don't make me any less a dude than Beardy McGiantweener. A bi person who likes both dudes and chicks would like me as a dude, and that would be perfectly bi. As a transgender man I AM on the gender binary, I just come at it from the other side.

Though I do agree that the two-ness of the term "bisexual" doesn't fully include intersex and genderfluid people, but that's an etymological concept, not a matter of attraction.
Pansexual might be a better word to describe the phenomena, but the attitudes flying around make both terms sort of unpleasant.

(P.S. The Pan which comes to my mind when I see the word is the Pan with the horns and the pipes and the goat legs, not the ones with the eggs and the frying)

Re: Somewhat related question

[(Anonymous)]

This whole mess right there is why I just started saying "queer".

I'm sure I could put together a bunch of special snowflake labels to describe my sexual preferences exactly, but in the end, that's between me and people who mutually want to have sex with me and they don't need to know which of my imaginary sexytimes checkboxes they tick off any more than I need to know which of theirs I do.