case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-18 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #2512 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2512 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dimestoresaint: Benson and Stabler (Default)

Re: Being the first commenter (at least as I type) inspired this

[personal profile] dimestoresaint 2013-11-19 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)

"Female-bodied person" doesn't sound snooty at all, and it's not what I was referring to. In that case you ARE talking about being female in the scientific or clinical sense. That's totally different than someone going "I just don't understand females!" like we're a different species or something.

gondremark: (Default)

Re: Being the first commenter (at least as I type) inspired this

[personal profile] gondremark 2013-11-19 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
When I use the phrase, it sounds awkward and full of definitions and it's definitely unweildy. It comes off as much more academic than I would like when I'm using it in ordinary conversations.
On the other hand, it's describes exactly what I mean with no room for doubt, so it IS ideal, but it SOUNDS kind of blathery. And it is a scientific or academic description, though, and totally falls under fair use that way :)
Edited 2013-11-19 18:36 (UTC)