Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-19 06:27 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2513 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2513 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Early post!
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-20 12:47 am (UTC)(link)it's your choice to feel justified in stealing the talents of an artisan, or course. rather, if they choose to give their skills away for free, then I suppose it wouldn't really be considered stealing. but why is it so wrong for an artist to choose to not give their skills away for free? if the market will not bear it, then the market will not bear it. clearly, however, the original anon is frustrated that the market is bearing it.
and I still have not been adequately swayed as to why it is fair to expect free work from one classification of artists, and yet, not another.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-20 01:06 am (UTC)(link)That's why I'm saying they're wasting money.
I never said one type of artist shouldn't charge money and the other can. But most fanartists don't charge people to see their personal fanart pieces; they charge for commissions or prints of a piece they posted on the internet for free-- as such, the customer gets a product tailored to their tastes, or a physical copy that they can display somewhere. The artist equivalent of what this specific author is doing is if an artist charged people just for looking at their fanart blog, while a thousand other artists aren't charging for it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-20 01:12 am (UTC)(link)perhaps it is the experience, then, that they are paying for?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-20 04:06 am (UTC)(link)