fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2514 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2514 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Add in the fact that almost all of the trans headcanons I've seen are based on gender stereotypes (i.e. "he dresses like a girl, therefore he must be a girl!"), and yeah, it's offensive.

This. This is what I see too often. Trans headcanons done right? Awesome. People looking at a female character who is "too muscled/tough/strong/etc" and deciding she's trans, or a male character who is "sensitive/soft/interested in girly hobbies/gay" and decided he's trans.

I've seen it all. Headcanons that have NO root in gender stereotypes and are just neat (like Sherlock, I've liked some of his transfic)... but then I see it all the time for gay characters that are "girly" so clearly they must literally have a vagina. Which I think is just offensive as all fuck and speaks to a lot of misogyny.

[ SECRET POST #2514 ]

+1

Re: +1