[ SECRET POST #2517 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2517 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

sometimes huge chunks of the context/history/backstory just suck, though.

i'll be honest, i've been reading x-men for a really long time (way too long, time to reevaluate my life choices) and there are certain runs i actively try to forget happened. even a couple of MUST READ, real-father-of-the-x-men-chris-claremont stories.

recent example: the fraction and brubaker runs. just say NO. don't do it, don't read, IGNORE IT ALL, that's my recommendation if someone asks me. yeah, i know he writes that cutesy hipster comic you like and shit, BUT DON'T TOUCH HIS X-MEN STUFF.

[(Anonymous)]

lmao i so successfully erased chuck austen's everything from my memory, it has no power over me, i have been cleansed.

he's boring, doesn't get the dramarama appeal of the x-men, doesn't suit his writing. and he continues the trend of worshipping scott that started with whedon's astonishing.