Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-30 03:25 pm
(no subject)
⌈ Secret Post #2524 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secret Santa sign-ups go up tomorrow! There will be a post explaining everything again/open to questions, too. Keep an eye out! :)
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Question about A/B/O dynamics
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)It seems like wasted potential in terms of the setting just to make them normal males and females as you'd find here, especially if the point is to toy with gender/sex roles.
Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
Betas are there to make alphas/omega more unique. This makes them mysterious and also helps with the "one person finds out they are an omega and have no idea what is going on" plots.
Betas are usually the majority. This can also go back to making alpha/omegas unique but it has also been used in stories to show that alphas and omegas are dying out. Some common reasons are that betas have low birthrates. An alpha or omega can only occur from a alpha/omega pairing (though rarely in beta/alpha or beta/omega).
In some cases betas are used to show how their is some kind of discrimination against alphas or (usually) omegas.
Or (most likely) authors don't think about this because they are influenced by other A/B/O writers who also don't think about this.
Also, a great deal of A/B/O actually doesn't have betas.
Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
Also, I think people wanted a basis for comparison. If you have betas, which are normal people, then you can easily compare the normal to the abnormal in your fic.
Overall, no one cares about wasted potential because most A/B/O isn't about social commentary or well thought out worlds, it's about sex. Sorry, anon. If you really wanted to see something toy with gender or sex roles in the way you describe and you've already mined what's out there you can either write your own or prompt it maybe?
Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
One thing you need to understand from the get-go is that there is no set standard of ABO dynamics - most authors either tap existing tropes for their (sub)fandom for shorter fics or just do their own system and worldbuilding for longer fics.
especially if the point is to toy with gender/sex roles.
It's usually just about fetishizing sex and gender roles, as well as impregnation kink, and sometimes D/s themes (I say sometimes because some people consider a D/s structure inherent to the ABO structure, but others think you can have an ABO structure without the D/s - depends on your own headcanons and whether you see ABO as just a physiological set-up, or a social and physiological set-up).
Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
Mostly it's just an excuse for porn like an other, but I've seen at least one where things are like you describe it: betas can have either, but as I recall are not very fertile/virile. "Male/female" dimorphism evolved separately, as the former body type is slightly more geared to virility and better at thriving in times of plenty, and the latter is slightly more geared to fertility and better at surviving when resources are scarce (irl, in fact, female sperm outcompete male sperm when their parents bodies are under stress, while male sperm edge out female sperm by a small ratio when they aren't). Over millions of years of evolution, those groups who had few males were less able to capitalize on times of plenty and were outcompeted by those who had more, and those groups with few females were more likely to die out in times of scarcity than those with more, so eventually the successful modern humans were those with a roughly 50-50 mix of the two body types.
My bone to pick with most ABO worldbuilders is the assumption that alphas would be both military grunts and great leaders because size/aggression/"dominance"/etc. I... those are mutually exclusive. Nobody who "leads" wants to die young, horribly, and most likely of an infection. Particularly if this is a world in which alphas are the rare elite. You'd probably never see them in the infantry, in that case, certainly not as anything other than a rear echelon officer, and now that most modern militaries have mandatory IQ tests for officers - and men with high levels of testosterone tend to have lower IQs than those who don't - you probably wouldn't even see them there.
Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
I could be totally off-base, though.
Re: Question about A/B/O dynamics
(Anonymous) 2013-12-01 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)http://archiveofourown.org/works/403644/chapters/665489