case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-30 03:25 pm

(no subject)


⌈ Secret Post #2524 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secret Santa sign-ups go up tomorrow! There will be a post explaining everything again/open to questions, too. Keep an eye out! :)

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Extreme SJW

(Anonymous) 2013-12-01 07:25 am (UTC)(link)
I thought the title 'Extreme SJW' was to get that anon's attention and then the first line is about how they're reading Jezebel again. I'm figuring because SJW!anon posted jezebel links a day or two ago?

Definitions are used where they're used anyway, you can't demand people only use certain words in certain locations o_O It's not lazy, it's communication with a term many people understand to mean (a person of) the crazy side of Social Justice issues.

Especially since acronyms are more out of convenience. I don't really see laziness moving into this.

Re: Extreme SJW

(Anonymous) 2013-12-01 11:24 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I saw it this way, too, as in "Hey, SJW troll, you've got me reading Jezebel again".