[ SECRET POST #2525 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2525 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It seems to me that the position actually being taken - in the example - is less a defense of the morality of the specific actions, and more a defense of violent action against prejudice and wrong and protracted systems of injustice. Which I think is reasonable - I, frankly, don't have a problem with someone deciding that they're just not going to care about the details of the show and root for what they want to see, and I think in general that the question of violence as a reaction to violent oppression and the role that the past plays in that question, I think that question is a lot more complicated than people make out.

As a reaction to the specific actions in the show, is it justified? Probably not. But even given that, I don't think it's reasonable to describe this reaction as "insane", either - it is, to be honest, much more nuanced than I would expect from Tumblr. Maybe there's somewhere else where people are being crazy; I've only seen the one example.