[ SECRET POST #2527 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2527 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt.

I did read The Hobbit, quite a while ago admittedly, but I was expecting them to stick a little closer to the tone of the movies released before that cinematically established the world. I did expect more humor in the Hobbit movies because of that, but thought it would be along the lines of Merry and Pippin or Legolas and Gimli's competition than slapstick and gross-out stuff.

[greenvelvetcake]

Funny, most of the book purists complain that the movies aren't light/humorous enough. The Hobbit book had practically none of the gravity seen in the Lord of the Rings.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

In that case, I agree. I've always been more of a fan of LOTR than The Hobbit because of the differences in tone, so I didn't bother watching the entirety of the movie, but what I did see had me cringing. It would make more sense to try to get more of the serious atmosphere LOTR had because chronologically The Hobbit movie came after the LOTR trilogy, not the other way around like it did with the books. It felt more like regression that progression.

[(Anonymous)]

OP:

Yeah, I didn't like The Hobbit book as much as LOTR, but you have the remember that it was a stand alone kid's book and wasn't originally connected to his Epic, Mythopoetic Silmarillion world. I've always thought the Shire and the Hobbit race in general feel like they don't "belong" to the rest of Middle Earth.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

Yeah, I just feel like the tone of the movie adaptations should fit into the cinematic universe since LOTR as a movie trilogy is already established. An upopular opinion among book fans, I know.

[(Anonymous)]

OP:

I understand your complaints. I thought it was cute, but I knew the bunny-sleigh was going to be just a tad too twee for a lot of people.

I think (hope) the third one is going to be more LOTRingish as I know they're going to include stuff from Tolkien's notes and unpublished stuff to try to connect the trilogies. And we have the Battle of Five Armies to look forward to and I assume it's not going to be "Bilbo, too bad you hit your head and missed that INCREDIBLY EXCITING EPIC BATTLE that just ended, but let me tell you it was AWESOME."