[ SECRET POST #2527 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2527 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[likeadeuce]

I think it's less a Watsonian critique of the character choices than a Doylist critique of 'Why do they make movies that are so full of destruction and then we're supposed to cheer in the end because everything DIDN'T be destroyed."

I don't take the critique all that seriously -- it's how the genre works, in most cases I think people are being too literal -- but that's how I understand it.

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

I always thought the point of showing destruction is to show a relatively small taste of what the villains would do on a hugely larger scale, if not stopped.