case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-03 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2527 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2527 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-04 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
Replying, "Maybe, maybe not. It would probably depend on whether or not the aliens wanted to raze the place or simply conquer it and keep the locals around more or less intact to run the place" to the statement, "If they were, they probably would have ended up equally dead without the intervention of the heroes, given that they were standing in the middle of a supervillain/alien/whatever attack" suggests that you wouldn't accept loss of life as a justifiable price to pay in order to prevent a "peaceful" alien occupation - that, unless the heroes are certain that the aliens want to raze the place completely, it would be better not to intervene and risk dropping a building on someone in the course of stopping the alien invasion. If that wasn't what you meant, you should've been more precise.
crunchysunrises: (clock face)

[personal profile] crunchysunrises 2013-12-04 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
It'd be more accurate to say that I believe in look at all the possibilities, rather than jumping to conclusions regarding what would be "best" for the people at ground zero.

Because what's best for them and what's best for the rest of the planet are two very different things. And both you and the original poster seem to be mixing the two things up.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-04 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
Because what's best for them and what's best for the rest of the planet are two very different things.

Then which should a hero who finds himself forced into the position of having to choose between the two favor? And should he be penalized for making that choice?

(Anonymous) 2013-12-04 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
sorry but that's part-and-parcel of being a hero. not everyone is going to like your stance. not everyone is going to like your decisions and not everyone is going to like the choices you make between two evils.