[ SECRET POST #2527 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2527 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Dolan's answer to the question of whether anyone could have pulled off the elves is "probably no one - maybe Sergei Eisenstein." So I think he gets that it's difficult, but his point would be that if you can't pull an adaptation of LotR off, why are you adapting it in the first place?

For me... well, I agree that the problem is inherently difficult, but the fact remains that the elves in the films are not sublime, that in fact they're kind of tawdry - their dwellings, their costumes, they themselves have always seemed that way to me. And if that kind of sublimity is difficult to attain, I still think that Jackson could have done a lot better - I think he fundamentally just misses the point, the central aspect of elves, what they are and what makes them function. And if the portrayal of the elves was doomed to be a failure, that doesn't mean his attempt was any good. Anyone would have failed, but Jackson doesn't even start in the right place.

For me, anyway!