[ SECRET POST #2528 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2528 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: WONDER WOMAN!!!

[(Anonymous)]

If it turns out that she simply can't bulk up -- and if bulked up is still the look they want -- then she will be recast.

do you have any evidence for this

Re: WONDER WOMAN!!!

[(Anonymous)]

What, you mean empirical evidence? Obviously not, because this is a hypothetical situation. I have faith in the belief that, should a person turn out to be unqualified for a job they were hired for, they would be replaced. Since that's how businesses work, and movie-making is one of those.

Re: WONDER WOMAN!!!

[chardmonster]

Since that's how businesses work, and movie-making is one of those.

IMPORTANT QUESTION: Have you seen

Re: WONDER WOMAN!!!

[(Anonymous)]

What I don't get here is your faith that the studios will recast someone who is conventionally attractive and has whatever qualities led them to cast her simply because they don't have the physical strength for the role.

I have absolutely no faith in that. As long as she's hot and an actress, I really don't think they give two shits whether she can pull off a convincing Wonder Woman.

Re: WONDER WOMAN!!!

[(Anonymous)]

It's probably because I'm nowhere near that point yet. See, I'm still at 'cautiously optimistic that this could turn out decent'. Speaking of the role long-term, yeah, she needs to do some serious work if we're going to be looking at a WW feature. For Batmas vs. Superman? A cameo at best? They just need to work on having her look right, and then we'll talk the future.

Re: WONDER WOMAN!!!

[(Anonymous)]

This is actually a negative example, but Sony is recasting Mary Jane for the new Spider-Man franchise. The former actress's scenes will not even be shown in Spider-Man 2. See: iconic character with small role in film, actress not deemed right for the job after being cast (for whatever reasons), hence recast. Sounds familiar? And this is for a movie coming out NEXT YEAR, not 2 years from now.