case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-17 07:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #2541 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2541 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with

[personal profile] feotakahari 2013-12-18 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, you actually understood The Fifth Head of Cerberus? I got the impression the author was planting clues to all the mysteries, complete with a difficulty curve as each novella's mystery became more complex, but I wasn't able to solve the mystery of even the first novella. (I was able to figure out that in the final novella,

GIANT MASSIVE SPOILER

the guy in the prison cell is actually the half-shapeshifter boy,

END SPOILER

but I still wasn't able to determine what the ending meant.)
Edited 2013-12-18 02:33 (UTC)

Re: In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with

(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't say that I understood all of it (and it's also been a while since I re-read the whole thing together) but I would say I understood some of it, and the Proust references are pretty plain to be seen (for instance I would say that the first sentence is a pretty clear reference - "When I was a boy my brother David and I had to go to bed early whether we were sleepy or not" against "For a long time I was accustomed to going to bed early").

I think, for a lot of it, it's less about figuring out the exact nature of events, and more to figure out the geometry of the thematic content - especially of identity, between the explorer and the half-shapeshifter boy in the final novella, and in the complicated familial relationships in the first novella. To go into more detail I'd have to go through and re-read it (which I might do anyway now that I'm thinking of it).