[ SECRET POST #2545 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2545 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

No. Just fucking no. What the blog's intention is and what it's effect is are not the same thing. Just because they claim to have good intentions doesn't mean that what they do or the way they do it is remotely okay.

Also, why are you constantly pimping the blog and trying to defend it? Because y'know -- what you just said about how it's bad if a celebrity makes a mistake and then repeats it and doesn't apologize -- that's exactly what that blog did with the utterly unforgivable John Green "story."

[(Anonymous)]

Which John Green story? I've seen a lot of wank about that dude and I'm not immediately sure what you're referring to

[(Anonymous)]

It's mentioned upthread by john egbert -- they claimed he assaulted a teenage girl without giving any evidence to back their claim up, then took the story down without acknowledging their mistake or apologizing.

[(Anonymous)]

whoops, I totally skipped over that part. my bad

[rivia]

Please clarify on the negative effect the blog has?

I'm not trying to defend it either, nor have I been "constantly pimping" it, I think this might be the first time I have linked it, though I might have months ago with something about Amanda Palmer, so kudos if you're remembering that or w/e I guess. I'm only just reading up on the John Green assault stuff (which i think is what you mean by the "story"?) now, though I can't find a lot about it aside from them rewording then removing it from JG's page and him denying it. I'm not disagreeing that they should have apologized, I just don't know if that invalidates all the other accurate (by being simply links to interviews and whatnot) info they've collected.