Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-23 07:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #2547 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2547 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Faithfulness vs Creativity in Adaptations?
Of course, this depends on what the source material is like, if it's a novel or a series, how many times it's been adapted before, etc. Because if it's been adapted a bunch of times in one way, I don't mind them aggressively altering things just for the sake of altering them in order to adapt it in a way that's different from all the previous adaptations to counterbalance the stereotyping effect of those previous adaptations. See Daniel Craig!James Bond and RDJ!Sherlock Holmes.
Heck, I don't even care that much if it's good or not. Like, even though it sort of sucked and was annoying, I still enjoyed Baz Luhrman's Great Gatsby a hell of a lot more than the other dull-as-fuck stagnant ones, like the Robert Redford adaptation from the '70s.