Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-24 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #2548 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2548 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
REMINDER: For people who needed extra time to finish for the FS Secret Santa - today's the last day to get in your gifts! Gifts go out tomorrow!
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
But when they don't, you're entitled to find them confusing and a little self-indulgent. Because they are.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-25 01:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
If their headcanon is particularly random (for instance, character who is never shown to have any sort of gender issues/ambiguity is now trans because I said so!) and they just mention it as a matter of fact in all their fic or whatnot, I'm also not likely to read their stuff, but hey, whatever.
DA
(Anonymous) 2013-12-25 01:53 am (UTC)(link)the only trans/genderqueer headcanons i've ever liked are the ones with NO "SIGNS" of that. because you know what, people "pass" all the time. you might have no fuckin' clue. you(general you) are not a social justice hero for seeing male and female characters with "non-traditional" personalities/appearances and deciding they CAN'T be who they say they are in canon.
Re: DA
Although I guess I'm the same way with headcanons with characters who ARE ambiguous too. It just seems like such a big thing to drop on a character without good reason.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2013-12-25 07:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2013-12-25 08:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-25 05:43 am (UTC)(link)