[ SECRET POST #2548 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2548 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

REMINDER: For people who needed extra time to finish for the FS Secret Santa - today's the last day to get in your gifts! Gifts go out tomorrow!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

In other cultures and languages someone being called "a dog" can have very different meanings though.

[(Anonymous)]

well good for them, but if some one in the cultures being discussed here is called a dog IT'S A BAD THING. ALWAYS BAD. it should not matter that some one else (who is not even involved in the conversation whatsoever) might think it's a good thing. in this context IT ISN'T.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, because pointing that OP has a point and there's more than one meaning in the whole world (hence the "anglo thing") is completely irrelevant in the context of the secret.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

All good and well, but the cultures I was referring to use it in a negative context, ergo using dog to negatively refer to someone is not an "anglo-thing"