[ SECRET POST #2551 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2551 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Resident Evil movies]


__________________________________________________



03. http://i43.tinypic.com/bg9zlf.gif
[moving .gif]


__________________________________________________














[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]













04. [SPOILERS for something but idk what]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Frozen]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Bioshock Infinite]



__________________________________________________













[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]















07. [WARNING for rape]

[Martin Freeman]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for domestic abuse]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: ????

[(Anonymous)]

“I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person," Robertson is quoted in GQ. "Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I’m with the blacks, because we’re white trash. We’re going across the field.... They’re singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what: These doggone white people’—not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/19/phil-robertson-black-people_n_4473474.html

Yeah, he wasn't dehumanizing black people! It's not like the happy black person stereotype wasn't at all dehumanizing way back when, naw.

Re: ????

[littlestbirds]

This too! Also failing to see the romantic lives of gay people as equivalent to his own, and equating them to some absurd biblical fantasy.

Re: ????

[(Anonymous)]

Which wasn't even about being gay. It was there to stop people from leaving for other religions, namely ones that liked fertility festivals.