[ SECRET POST #2552 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2552 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Ugh

[intrigueing]

I salute Ms. Steinem for helping develop modern feminism.

Her doing that, however, does not in any way mean views of hers, such as this one, are not utterly fucking disgusting, offensive, stupid, nonsensical, and utterly, completely outdated. Doing some things that turned out to be positive does not automatically mean that everything that comes out of your mouth magically becomes true even if it's patently, fundamentally, transparently wrong. A statement that is wrong does not become right just because it was uttered by a influential figure. That is not how logic works.

And no, it's not a valid analogy. Nazism and the patriarchy can both be described with the adjectives "bad" and "oppressive", but that's where the similarities end. The most basic difference being that Playboy is not propaganda for a political cause. Playboy is about selling magazines to a readership.