Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-01 07:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #2556 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2556 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - titc ], [ 1 - I can't post this as an actual secret (since it isn't one), but a nice update from an OP ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

I was rather dissapointed.
It was good when it was ambigious. It suprned discussion. I thought that was what he wanted, and there were hints that both siblings had a point (Walky is a somewhat goofy child but in addition to looking more "white" does well in school and presents with very little drama, so he gets along well with his parents. Sal does seem to get treated different but has an actual criminal past that contributes to the strained relationship and flees almost immediately after showing up then yells at her brother about it)
The problem was when Willis started going "nope, Sal is right AND YOUR RACIST OR IGORNANT IF YOU CANT SEE THAT". Rather then keep it grey, with Sal having both some accuracy and some bitterness-clouded interpretations of her past and her reactions to it he's implying it's very simply this way and allowing for no interpretation of the work to be tolerated but that.
If you want it to be clear, in your work, you should make it clear IN YOUR WORK. Not tantrum on the internet and close down comments because of all the racists (read: People having fair interpretations of the work based on what's been presented so far in the story). Especially that last part. When you close down comments like that, it's hard to keep the same respect for an author.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
spurned is what willis did AFTER he stopped being ambiguous
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
In my defense I didn't know he had just died.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
But that sucks ball. Eh, well, now I guess you just have a better reason not to read the comments.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I was rather dissapointed.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-02 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)I just...how does that even come up?
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
He also had that problem with the 'Everybody around Dorothy is a misogynist jackhole' thing. Except, of course, nobody had ever actually been shown making any 'you're a woman, so you're going to give up on your dreams to raise a family' thing she supposedly got from everybody but her parents (the one who came closest was her mother, ironically).
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
I mean, he's the author and I respect the author's headcanon is basically canon, but it seems he puts in subtle references that are at best "maybe this" and expects other people to see "clearly this"
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-02 04:28 am (UTC)(link)Really, I'd have been done with his comics long ago, but damn it, I just care about his characters and what happens to them too much.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
Re: I was rather dissapointed.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-02 05:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: I was rather dissapointed.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-02 07:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: I was rather dissapointed.